Monday, September 9, 2024

Me and Ozymandias

 

The woman who was seated next to me at a dinner party on this Island paradise of mine, was one of some accomplishment; a doctor, and one of Miami’s shining lights in her field. She was having trouble grasping my concept that it is just as possible to be compulsive about doing nothing as it is to be obsessive over actually accomplishing something.

 

Explaining my post-Hollywood life during the quarter century that had elapsed since my early retirement at age 58, I articulated how it was that once upon a time all my “wires” were plugged into a television monitor, but that just before coming into the current century, I removed them all in order to reinsert each one into a Fisher Island monitor.

“The secret,” I confided, in something approaching sotto voce: “no loose wires.”

 

In other words, once I had made my decision to move to Florida, I resolved not to dabble in my former business. The very few times I found myself in any way tempted, it almost destroyed my formula for success in my newfound world of contentment. Without exception, I have regretted any flirtation with my erstwhile career.

 

The Doctor stared at me. Besides being a scientist heavily vested in the system, she was born and brought up in a Korean household… a culture that has, along with most of Asia, taught its children well how to work and achieve in the American way. Dinner now being over, so was our evening; the good doctor had to be up early for surgery.

 

Not me. I enjoy my rest, my recreation, my time to myself, but more and more of late people wonder if I might experience an ever-growing sense of a loss of identity…or, more to the point… a loss of self-esteem and/or self-purpose as the years go by and the successes of the past grow ever more distant. 

 

I recall that very “grown up” movie my parents took me to where the leading man (I think it was Fredric March) had left his wife in the East for an illicit romantic idle at some exotic locale on the coast of central California. Now, unhappy with the aimless life he had so recently sought, Mr. March complained to his mistress, “… it’s always Indian Summer here…” 

 

I didn’t get his problem at the age of six and, frankly, I still don’t. I do appreciate that, on many levels, that this is “it” for me…that with no more mountains to climb, no more wars to win, I long ago abandoned that thing that traditionally drives men on and that

being me is not what it used to be. And if I can’t be who I have always been, then what?

I find that I am becoming… if not boring, then certainly potentially less relevant and, coincidently (?), ever more reclusive. My mind leaps to the bull elephant “thing.” The preparation to go off from the herd to find that final place of rest.

 

The ROMEOs (Retired Old Men Eating Out), with whom I meet every Friday, occasionally touch on this, but unlike me, most of them seem more interested in living forever than figuring out where that final exit ramp might take them.

 

My life is good, albeit inordinately long, and that is cause for some amount of worry. Not only because of the possibility of too much life at the end of the money, but possibly because the longer I am on the planet, the farther I am from those days that for most of my life defined who I was because of what I had done. It was not always thus. Years before I had told P.K. Knelman, my one-time fabulous assistant, that I did not want to be defined by my work.

 

“I hate to tell you this,” came Ms. Knelman’s retort, “but Mother Theresa is defined by her work. It is not necessarily a bad thing.”

 

Those were the days when Cagney & Lacey, my signature hit, was mentioned in nearly everything written that defined quality television, when Gloria Steinem paraded me through multiple events in Washington D.C. as the darling of the women’s movement, and when (at Hollywood’s Genie Awards) following Norman Lear’s introduction as “King” Lear, I was introduced as the industry’s “heir apparent.” Those were the days of another century.

 

Since then, there has been an explosion of brilliant television: The Sopranos, Deadwood, The Game of Thrones, The West Wing, Homeland, Justified, The Americans… and we are barely a quarter of the way into the 21st century. Variety no longer finds it necessary to mention my show in its top 100 list of the best of the all-time shows on television. For twenty years or so I never cared all that much, but I find that now, that I no longer have the tools with which to fight back, it stings.

 

Several years back, grazing through the plethora of shows on my bedroom television screen, I finally settled on a documentary about the life of famed film producer, David O. Selznick. A good place for me to halt my graze.

 

“He’s a producer, I’m a producer... could be interesting,” I remember thinking.

 

Interesting, yes, but Mr. Selznick and I had little in common outside of that producer’s credit. He was a driven, unhappy man who literally ruined his life in the failed attempt to change what he believed would be the headline for his obituary in the New York Times:

David O. Selznick, Producer of “Gone With The Wind,” Died Today.

 

Selznick was a young man when he produced that singular hit and its specter haunted him. With each passing season, and with each less than spectacular film that followed, it became increasingly clear that he would never surpass what he had done so many years before with the result being that Selznick died an unhappy and unfulfilled individual.

 

I remember turning off my TV at that final informative moment and thinking, “that’s interesting. When I die, the New York Times will write:

Barney Rosenzweig, Producer of “Cagney & Lacey,” Died Today.

 

What can I say? That worked for me.

 

That was then. Now, although the headline still does “work” for me, I am none too sure that is what will be written… or if the Times will even deign to have an obituary of any kind for this one-time/too long-ago TV heavyweight of the 1980s.

 

Staying too long at the fair used to be something that applied to my fellow show runners who hung around past their prime in the world of show business. Now I see it as a flaw in a world of longevity run amok with octogenarians running for President and more.

 

Once again I find myself at odds with the politics of the now. Who gives a damn about the “Right to Life,” I shout at my television screen as I realize I am far more interested in its opposite. I think of how well I feel, how good I look at 86 and a half years of age, and I resolve to check that portrait of me in the storage room.

 

Like Selznick’s famous heroine, maybe tomorrow.

 

 

Barney Rosenzweig

 

Saturday, August 24, 2024

POST OP

I have yet to master the sit-down. This is not to be confused with the sit-in made popular in political seasons such as these. The sit-down to which I refer relates to the fact that last week’s hernia surgery still plays a significant role in the day-to-day of this aging correspondent. Who knew that sitting upright in front of a word processor requires the flexing of one’s core? Those few muscles I have left around the stomach area can not only distract, they can just plain hurt.

I am okay. I have been told not to exercise for up to six weeks. A prescription not to do something I hate doing anyway seemed a small price to pay for ridding myself of the growing discomfort in my left groin.

It has been just over a week since my operation and, as you might well imagine, I have been watching quite a bit of TV. Some of it is not too bad, but most of it is not worthy of much in the way of a mention.

Bad Monkey has some cute stuff to recommend as a kind of funky cop show set in the Florida Keys. You could do worse, and Vince Vaughn’s presence as the lead in the Apple TV+ series is a definite plus. Slow Horses, also on Apple TV+ is better… but only if you are into the British way of presenting their version of a spy drama where, inevitably, the spooks wind up looking inward at their own failings rather than that of whatever enemy they are sworn to oppose. Gary Oldman is perfect, followed closely by Kristin Scott Thomas and Jonathan Pryce. The rest of the cast is first rate as well… still, it is not for everyone.

The limited series, Presumed Innocent, starring Jake Gyllenhaal might be worth your time. I would grade it a B- which is fair praise for a suspense series with a disappointing contrivance for an ending. I thought Peter Sarsgaard was particularly good and even better was the guy who played his boss, O-T Fagbenle. It is on Apple TV+.

Finally, via Disney+, there is Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour (Taylor’s “version”). It is anything but… swift, that is. Three-and one-half hours of a stadium show filmed in front of a live audience of 70,000 plus. Ms. Swift is, I must assume from all I have read, something of a show biz and money making phenomenon. You could not prove it by me. She is pleasant enough to look at, but three and a half hours of her songs… which all sound pretty much alike… C’mon, Sinatra would not have even considered doing such a thing, nor would Streisand, and both are easily so much better than this young woman will ever be. Her voice is limited, and her dancing is rudimentary.

Please no letters refuting my dim view of this luminary. I get that she is the all-American girl, that her endorsement of someone running for President is meaningful, and that I am on the wrong side of some kind of movement here. Blame It on my recent surgery and move on. Lest it go unsaid, the special is particularly well directed and produced.

I am just about out of sit-down tolerance. By way of closing, let me segue into what follows, some of it written pre-surgery as a follow-up to my last column.

Nine years ago, I was on a visit to Los Angeles when a writer friend called to invite me to join her and some pals for cocktails and hors d’oeuvres and to watch the year’s first prime-time Republican Presidential debate. It was the kick-off for an election that would take place more than 15 months later.

Within minutes of the start of the FOX presentation, the Beverly Hills crowd had left the TV viewing area to imbibe, leaving me alone in the dark with Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, Mike Huckabee, Ben Carson, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Chris Christie, John Kasich, and Donald J. Trump.

As the debate ended, those previously in my company returned, curious about who I thought was the likely winner and eventual candidate to replace Barack Obama in the White House.

I believe I surprised everyone in that assemblage of Hollywood lefties by picking the guy who 15 months later would defeat Hillary Clinton to become the 45th President of the United States.

Asked to explain this choice, I espoused my thesis that Americans do not know very much about government or governing; they are not well educated in civics, nor are they particularly well read on history or politics. I was diplomatic enough not to point out how each of them had abandoned the televised debate, preferring their prosecco to politics, but instead went on to conclude: “What our fellow citizens do very well, however… is watch television.” Pausing for effect, I then added, “Donald Trump is good television.”

He is, too. As flawed and under-educated as he is… and has proven himself to be, for the past decade he has flummoxed the better educated, the more articulate, and the more knowledgeable of his adversaries. It is as if he has learned to defy gravity as he looms large over and into all our lives, through the massive crowds that gather at his rallies, into our living rooms via our television screens where, Elmer Gantry-like, he preaches and teaches us a new gospel.

That was then. Nine years later there is a new girl in town, and the TV is rocking with this whole fresh look. And it is “the look,” that is an essential part of the visual medium of television. It is not just who is prettier, or who is the better dresser. It is about contrast: Cagney & LaceyStarsky & Hutch… the ampersands may signify partnership, but there is a reason one is a blonde and the other a brunette, why one comes from a working-class environment and the other does not. Think about any wrestling match you ever saw on your home television screen; it is all about contrast… the yin and the yang.

This year, two old white guys were set for a rematch of their 2020 contest. The contrast… at least visually… just was not enough to capture the imagination of the American public. Interest in the election was at an historic low.

That has now all taken a very dramatic… great TV… turn. Our election is no longer about two old guys but is now a battle of the sexes coupled with young versus old. Did you see her acceptance speech at the Democratic convention? Ms. Harris is not anyone’s apprentice. What she delivered amid a perfectly produced Democratic convention was one of the best acceptance speeches of my lifetime. What she dispelled, in the process, was any doubt that she is anything less than fully capable of taking on the mantle of leader of the free world. What had failed to excite the American voter is now in the past.

Whatever side you are on, it all makes for terrific TV and (surprise, surprise) America is watching. Ratings for the conventions were record breakers. It really is a good sign with a great headline: America Wins.

Post-Script: Never mind that I find it slightly disconcerting that Ms. Harris looks an awful lot like one of my ex-wives. I am going to bite the bullet and vote for her anyway.

 

Barney Rosenzweig

Friday, August 9, 2024

BEST SHOW OF THE SEASON

It has been a while since I could say with confidence that the best kept secret in North America was summer on Fisher Island. The weather this season has been the worst of my nearly 30 years on this Island paradise.

Michael Fuchs from his lovely New York country home, 45 minutes from Broadway, tells me it is brutal there as well. Charleston, America’s most popular tourist city, is all but uninhabitable this August and I have only just returned from California where, simply put, the weather is terrible.

My first hernia has kept me off the beach and out of the pool. The prescribed pain medication turned out to be worse than the discomfort I now feel without it, as I (not-so) patiently await word on just when someone… anyone… with something sharper than a butter knife will operate. Until today I have been distracted enough by the whole thing so that word processing an email, let alone an article, just had to be placed on a backburner.

And what is there to write about anyway? I am disappointed in the current streaming season, politics has been depressing, and besides, I semi-resolved a long time ago to refrain from writing about events on our national scene. What can I say? I like being liked… enjoy the feeling of a certain amount of popularity. I do not mind folks disagreeing with something negative I might write about one of their favorite shows on TV or Broadway, but I really do not want to get one of those “Dear commie, Jew, bastard… take me off your email list” missives. Those tend to go a long way toward spoiling my day.

No matter how terrific, I have balked about---and am reluctant to once again rave about---Bear or Hacks in their latest season…  Still, little else has inspired or transpired.

And then, out of nowhere, the best show of this or any season in memory hits the airways. All hail, executive producer, Joe Biden, and producer/star Kamala Harris. Who knew anyone could turn this moribund, perfectly dreadful electoral season into the television event of this or any summer in memory? Trump getting shot did not do it, the President of the United States melting down on national television to his opponent’s barrage of bluff and bluster did not do it, nor did the prospect of a rematch of two heavyweights. No one… I mean no one… gave a damn about this election.

Now they do. There is true excitement in the air… a real sense of joy,  adventure, and patriotism. How could that happen with a candidate who supposedly no one knew or liked? And who knew the Democrats had a bench?

That Governor from Pennsylvania is the best political orator since Obama. Pete Buttigieg stays fresh on more TV shows in one evening than any other surrogate I have ever seen. The guy from Arizona is a former astronaut for God’s sake, and then there is the fella who got picked as a running mate… Mr. Rogers on steroids.

There is excitement in and on the air in a way I have not seen in a decade, and it came out of nowhere. That takes some kind of showmanship skill… and a whole lot of luck.

Trump, up until now the ultimate showman in politics, got a little ahead of his skis… just a wee bit overconfident. How could he not? His opponent, despite being the President of the United States, was characterized as unelectable no matter how competent he might be for State occasions or in the Oval office. The old man just was not playing well on TV and there was no getting over that perfectly awful appearance against Trump in the debate. That toothpaste was never going back in the tube.

To add to his luster, Trump got his ear nicked by a would-be assassin then popped to his feet with a defiant gesture to let the crowd know he was intact and ready to continue the fight. There is no way this guy could lose; how could he not be confident of that? So confident as to listen to Donald Jr. and Eric about who to pick as his running mate. C’mon, mittendrin you are going to pause for a revival of Dumb and Dumber? Well, why not? Afterall, what difference would it make who got that nod? It is all about Trump and nothing and no one else matters.

And then…

I am not saying Donald Trump is going to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory. In fact, I am almost positive the contrary will be the case. America, after all, is a very conservative country… almost always has been… and over the past several years Trump has unleashed some powerful elements into the ether that have fused into some of the most right-wing alliances this country has ever seen. And if you know your American political history, that is saying a lot.

So, I have not given back my brochures from the realtors of southern Spain and Portugal, but… as a self-proclaimed TV pundit… I cannot refrain from extolling kudos over one of the biggest and best TV productions of my lifetime.

Win or lose: Joe Biden and Kamala Harris deserve a trophy. They made my summer. And when you consider the hernia, the pain, the weather, no pool, no beach, and the (not-so)“Dear…” letters that may still arrive in my in-box... That is saying a lot.

 

Barney Rosenzweig

 

 

 

Friday, July 5, 2024

GUILTY PLEASURES

 

Among the great movie watching pleasures is the successful putting together of a double feature night; two films, ideally starring the same actor or actress, in two entirely different idioms, so that the lesser of the two screeners (the “B” movie) is the opposite of whatever it is about the “A” movie that got the double feature night started in the first place.

It really adds to the fun if the two films are not only opposites in all the obvious ways… such as one being a comedy and the other being a drama… but if at least one of the films is of far greater stature than the other and much more well known. And, if by any chance that “B” movie is one that heretofore was completely unknown to anyone in the home audience… and it comes through as a nice surprise piece of entertainment… well, a doubling of one’s pleasure is more than assured.

There are a couple of tricks that help to make this work. First, know your “A” movie. It is one you must believe is sure-fire, bound-to-please, and worthy of seeing again… and again. Second, run it last. Seems obvious, “save the best for last” and all that, but it is important that you have the top movie as a closer for your evening just in case your heretofore unknown “B” movie is something less than a happy surprise.

I am not going to spoil your fun by creating a list of such “A” movie/ “B” movie combos, but I will share with you one recently screened at the Casa de Rosenzweig as it all proved to be too good not to share.

To begin with, Charlize Theron was the star of the evening. There is a veritable plethora of films from which to select an “A” contender from her oeuvre, including three films where she was nominated for an Oscar. The one I picked… my favorite among the films featuring this star… is one of her very best, Atomic Blonde.

Knowing I had this very terrific 2017 action-thriller “in the bank” as my “A” closer, I moved down the list of films starring Ms. Theron that I did not know. Long Shot, a 2019 romantic comedy in which this beautiful leading lady is paired with Seth Rogen was the pick and it was a lucky one.

Rogen and Theron are a most unlikely romantic duo but the premise as to how/why they might be together works and the surprising chemistry between them is palpable. (It should be noted that a lack of chemistry between Theron and anyone with a pulse is all but impossible to imagine so what she had going on with Mr. Rogen was not really that much of a surprise.)

But I digress: The movie is a hoot, and you should see it, with or without it being part of a double feature evening.

As to the pleasure of watching something designed to be seen back-to-back- to-back, there is the television series. I am one of those men who has had to admit to liking the work of writer/producer Shonda Rhimes. Well, some of it, anyway. The Kerry Washington vehicle, Scandal, remains near the top of any guilty pleasure list I assemble; marry that success with the megahit Grey’s Anatomy and you have the makings of a Shondaland empire which can put forward something such as streaming giant, Bridgerton.

19th century bodice rippers are not normally my cup of tea. Proof of that is Bridgerton has been streaming since 2020 and I am only now, mid-2024,  getting around to the Netflix blockbuster. What can I say? I thought I should tune in before the entire economic model for this kind of series collapsed and, surprise, surprise, it did not disappoint… on any level… both good and bad.

There is plenty here to scoff at. Cliches in abundance, excesses so over the top that one begins to wonder if there is a top at all, or if the silly soapiness will just go onward and upward into space and beyond. Bridgerton provides an ample supply of things at which to aim one’s pop gun… there are far too many fish in this barrel to have it resemble anything like sport for any critic of the cinematic arts.

Okay… enough.

Bridgerton is also entertaining. It is lush and over-the-top luxurious. It is sexy and it is well made. Ms. Rhimes knows her stuff… and, not unlike the proverbial sister Kate, she knows it good. She also just might be doing something better than good while she is at it being as how she single-handedly has done more for diversity in Hollywood, on screen and behind the scenes, than a generation of NAACP super activists… hell, maybe two generations… combined.

Bridgerton is not Outlander terrific… and other than the abundance of sex scenes it does not seem to even wish to hold the very good Scottish period drama up as something to emulate. With Bridgerton, it would appear, Ms. Rhimes is content to stay within her niche … a tale of manners and mores with a tongue very much in cheek (plus just about every other place you can imagine).

There are just too many reasons to watch this… even if it is only to sneer at the rest of us. And I am okay with that, as I believe that during these times of inordinate trials and tribulations, one should take their pleasures where they can find them.

 

Barney Rosenzweig

 

Saturday, June 29, 2024

A TRUE PAIN IN THE NECK

 

People ask me what to watch all the time. One would think they are not paying attention to these notes from a warm Island and…turns out… these particular people are not. They are mostly neighbors on my Island and not recipients of my columns of views, reviews, and opinions.

As is the case with so many members of the privileged class, these folks do not deign to look up commentary on such sites as Alive on South Beach, let alone CagneyandLacey.com.

I try not to get too involved with the neighbors. Long ago I resolved never to attend any event in which more than six of the locals gathered at any one time, and to always do everything possible to avoid eye contact. A plaque that adorns the wall adjacent to my front door reads “Mr. Rogers did not adequately prepare me for the people in my neighborhood.”

I am easier about my rigidity regarding my tiny community when we are on a one-on-one basis, and that is generally when I get asked about what I recommend in the realm of entertainment.

So what is it that now brings me to the word processor? In these brief conversations with the neighbors, I have found myself enthusiastically recommending a television series about which, up until now, I have not written a word.

I thought that strange at first, but the reason is understandable. I do not think I really know how to write about this new show I am about to recommend. I certainly do not know how to write about it with any authority.

The series is Interview with the Vampire, the latest incarnation of The Vampire Chronicles by Anne Rice which you can see on AMC or stream on Amazon Prime. I think it is very good… maybe excellent… but honestly, I don’t know.

Why the equivocation? A confession: I know almost nothing about this genre. Not just vampire flicks but horror movies in general. The closest I got to being any kind of a fan of these films was as a kid when Abbott & Costello met (you name it) The Mummy, Frankenstein, or both. I never read the books by Ms. Rice and never saw “the original” of her films, which starred no less than Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt.

That said, I confess to doing a fair imitation of Bela Lugosi’s Count Dracula:

“Bateman, Bateman, let me out. I’ll fix your face.” Or “Only one moment of pain, and then… eternal life.”

Okay, okay. You sort of have to be there and catch me after the second martini.

Onward:

I watched this two-season series because Allyn, the second of my three daughters, showed up at my doorstep on Father’s Day as my surprise for the holiday. Father’s Day, and every other day, Allyn is a horror film freak. Literally… A FREAK! We “had” to watch this show, she insisted, and so, watch it we did.

Well, what can I say? It is pretty damn good. I cannot compare it with much, because… well, you know why, right? No real frame of reference with which to make a comparison (I vaguely remember Bram Stoker’s Dracula…the movie and not the 19th century novel… which I only attended because  Francis Ford Coppola directed). I have no real passion for the art form, let alone any knowledge of the historical context of the genre. But there are some good special effects, great sets, a nice bunch of actors, though truth to tell, there were only a few I recognized.

A lot of the time I did not know what was going on… no, not because I am heterosexual and the leads… well, they just aren’t… but because I don’t understand all of the rules about vampires that (according to Allyn) “everyone knows.”

My admonition is that you read the books by Ms. Rice to better understand the terrain. I am told they are good and that they sort of provide a road map for all that goes down (no pun intended) in this 12-episode series which takes place over multiple decades (centuries?) and goes from Dubai, to New Orleans, then Paris.

Footnote number one of two:

Want to read an erudite commentary on this current series? Here is a link provided by the kinder:

https://www.vulture.com/article/interview-with-the-vampire-recap-season-2-episode-6.html

Footnote number two:

As a result of this introduction, I paid out the five bucks to Amazon and rented the 1994 adaptation with Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise. Turned it off in less than 15 minutes. What a stinker. Not only does it not compare with the current Interview with the Vampire, messieurs Cruise and Pitt must have made some deal with the dark side which enabled them to keep their careers intact after this piece of junk. Fifteen minutes… a lot more than “one moment of pain.”

 

Barney Rosenzweig

Saturday, June 22, 2024

TWO GALS AND A GUY

 

Jessica Lange ranks high in the pantheon of great American actresses and in The Great Lillian Hall she takes on a role she should be able to do in her sleep… playing one of Broadway’s first women of the American stage.

The wrinkle is when and where we find Ms. Hall as the film begins and that is in a new production of Chekhov’s The Cherry Orchard. This actor’s dream is rapidly becoming her nightmare as the once great diva struggles with the onset of dementia.

You are in good hands here and my adding two cents is not much needed. The MAX presentation is in the best tradition of its former HBO self… a simple, predictable, straight-forward production. Ms. Lange could not be better in her title role, Kathy Bates is nice in support as the diva’s long-time acerbic assistant, with Pierce Brosnan as the friendly NY Midtown neighbor. Lily Rabe gives a solid portrayal of the long-suffering daughter of the great lady. The show will garner more than its share of nominations come Emmy season.

Following Ms. Lange on MAX is another fine film actress, starring in a six-episode mini-series, The Regime. This time actress Kate Winslet carries the load… but not alone. The award-winning female star gets ample support from a production team that features fabulous costuming, great sets, and a solid ensemble of international actors in support, including an odd choice for a cameo role by Hugh Grant.

The writing of this lushly produced series is what must come under some degree of scrutiny. The “play” and its makers cannot seem to sort out if they are making Evita or Veep and it takes at least five of the show’s six episodes to “decide” which of those two diva types will dominate in the end.

Winslet is a terrific actress… and she shows us a wide range of stuff from her bag of tricks, including some disconcerting business with her lower lip… but tricks alone will not carry the day when it isn’t clear just what our reaction as audience members should be to the story we are being told.

One of the reasons TV invented the “laugh track” was to remind those singular folks out there in front of their lonely television screens that it was okay to chuckle… out loud. Trust me, this becomes even more difficult when the people making the picture cannot seem to decide which it is they want you to do; laugh or cry. Me? Good as Ms. Winslet always is, I found myself wishing that HBO had decided to make this mini with Julia Louis-Dreyfuss.

What is worse than having one’s film maker not knowing if he wants the audience to laugh or cry? How about wanting them to laugh but failing at it… badly.

Franklin, the Apple TV+ mini-series, does this… more than it should. Lame attempts at humor aside, this mini-series featuring Michael Douglas as America’s ambassador to France circa 1776, looks posh enough, both in costumes and sets and the production values are top of scale. Mr. Douglas is a fine actor who is just about age-appropriate for the title role of Benjamin Franklin at the time of the American Revolutionary War and one should add to the above a solid list of substantial credits for the writers and producers of this series.

That said, considering the bulk of the piece is about international intrigue, coupled with diplomacy in its earliest forms… and that much of this is done in French… is it too much to ask that these very smart historians and screenwriters make some kind of an effort to let their audience in on just what is going on? Sacre’ bleu!

Maybe it’s me. I waited something like 15 years before I got around to seeing John Adams on MAX. Perhaps if I wait a bit longer before trying to finish Franklin, it too will age well.

 

Barney Rosenzweig

 

Tuesday, June 11, 2024

SHORT SHRIFT ELONGATED

Does anyone else find it at least mildly amusing that English novelist George Eliot… the very same 19th century author who is universally quoted for the admonishment “never judge a book by its cover”… was, in fact, a woman? Honest. Mary Ann Evans is responsible for the quote and the seven novels credited to Mr. Eliot.

This is the stuff of the COVID sufferer on an island paradise in Florida’s sub-tropics. Just why I would research something like that at this time is really the subject of this article which focuses on the wisdom of drawing a conclusion about a television series based on viewing only its first episode.

As in so many things, temptation makes these things understandable. The opening episode of A Man in Full was an easy tip-off to flip off the TV and run off into the night. Alas, I did not do that but remained at my post through the entire six-episode Netflix debacle.

Sugar on Apple TV was next, and my thought was not to be so seriously misled again. True, the opening episode of this private eye homage to Hollywood and film noir, starring Colin Farrell, was not nearly so poorly conceived as the previously mentioned Jeff Daniels’ piece, but it was just too cute by half for me to stick with it for another seven episodes.

I have been spoiled by J.J. Abrams. The opening episode of his series Alias, with Jennifer Garner, or his subsequent series, LOST are paradigms of how to begin a television series that will capture an audience and give those viewers every reason to want to continue to watch what comes next. More recently, writers Donald Glover and Francesca Sloane prove that knowing how to start a television series is NOT a lost art and they demonstrate that in their recent Amazon Prime hit, Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

This is not rocket science. In fact, it is sort of series creation 101. Still, not everyone gets it. Sometimes, though, it is the fault of the viewer (or, in this case, reviewer). I did not much like Game of Thrones when it debuted. Not my cup of tea, I thought… and the actors’ accents and the arcane dialogue did not resonate for me. Weeks later I returned to the show and… well, save for that final episode, I became and remained a huge fan for years.

I got through the worst episode of David Milch’s first series on HBO out of respect for the writer, the cast that had been assembled, and the nagging thought that something special was about to occur. It did, and Deadwood remains at the top of my list for all-time best television series. It took me two episodes to get into Watchmen, but with the arrival of Jean Smart’s character I was sold.

I will not go on much longer. Still, I find my COVID racked brain wondering… why not?

I digress. The point of the piece is the rush to judgment. Often not a good thing. I revisited Sugar and streamed the final seven episodes in two sessions. It is a good show. Not a great show even though it is now sharing this column with Game of Thrones, Deadwood, Alias and LOST. It ain’t one of those. It is not even a Mr. & Mrs. Smith, but it is good. The cast is spot on, the direction is stylish, the reveal in the penultimate episode is a genuine surprise, and my admonition to you is to watch this.

And lest it was not clear from the short shrift given RIPLEY in previous columns, this series also is to be watched and admired. Stylish, cinematic, well-acted and beautifully staged, I commend these Netflix eight episodes to you with the caveat that RIPLEY is methodically tense throughout. You want to watch TV to relax? Stick with Netflix and revisit The Good Place with Ted Danson and Kristen Bell. Simply delightful.

 

Barney Rosenzweig